Government of Gujarat vs SANGITABEN BHIKHUBHAI NAGINABHAI CHAUDHARI — 603/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070006852026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

603/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

603/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008260073

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGITABEN BHIKHUBHAI NAGINABHAI CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Bardoli Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and 2017 (Section 65(a)(a)) for drug-related offenses. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to simple imprisonment for 3 days plus a fine of Rs. 100, with the court applying the proportionality principle and considering the accused's economic and social circumstances for lenient sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bardoli Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and 2017 (Section 65(a)(a)) for drug-related offenses. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to simple imprisonment for 3 days plus a fine of Rs. 100, with the court applying the proportionality principle and considering the accused's economic and social circumstances for lenient sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case