Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI KANTIBHAI RATHOD — 598/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070006792026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

598/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

598/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008251335

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI KANTIBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The Bardoli Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2017 for a drug-related offense. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment for 3 days and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an additional 3 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the principle of proportionality of sentence and considered the accused's economic and social circumstances in awarding a lenient sentence after the accused pleaded guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 598/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bardoli Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2017 for a drug-related offense. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment for 3 days and imposed a fine of ₹100, with an additional 3 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court applied the principle of proportionality of sentence and considered the accused's economic and social circumstances in awarding a lenient sentence after the accused pleaded guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case