THE BARDOLI NAGARIK SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED vs HARDIK RAJENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - S K BHATIYA — 370/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR070004302026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
370/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
370/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE BARDOLI NAGARIK SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED
Adv. Y P SHAH
Respondent(s)
HARDIK RAJENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - S K BHATIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court recorded a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat and acquitted the accused. However, the acquittal is conditional—if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces, the complainant may revive proceedings per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court recorded a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat and acquitted the accused. However, the acquittal is conditional—if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces, the complainant may revive proceedings per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts