ANANDKUMAR USHREDDY PATEL vs BRIJESHBHAI BHAGUBHAI PATEL — 239/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070002852026

Filing Number

239/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

239/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANDKUMAR USHREDDY PATEL

    Adv. K G MISTRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BRIJESHBHAI BHAGUBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Bardoli court acquitted the accused in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after recording a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused through National Lok Adalat. However, the acquittal is conditional—if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to file fresh proceedings as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bardoli court acquitted the accused in a cheque bounce case (Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act) after recording a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused through National Lok Adalat. However, the acquittal is conditional—if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to file fresh proceedings as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case