JIGNASHABEN D/O NAVINBHAI NAYAKA W/O DHARMESHBHAI PARBHUBHAI CHAUDHARI vs DHARMESHBHAI PARBHUBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - D M DUBEY — 2/2026

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070000082026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JIGNASHABEN D/O NAVINBHAI NAYAKA W/O DHARMESHBHAI PARBHUBHAI CHAUDHARI

    Adv. S B VASAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARMESHBHAI PARBHUBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - D M DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the complainant's application to withdraw a cheque-related criminal complaint under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 B.N.S.S., as the dispute was amicably settled with full payment and compensation. The accused was acquitted following the voluntary withdrawal, which was confirmed to be made without coercion or undue influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the complainant's application to withdraw a cheque-related criminal complaint under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 B.N.S.S., as the dispute was amicably settled with full payment and compensation. The accused was acquitted following the voluntary withdrawal, which was confirmed to be made without coercion or undue influence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case