MS.D C SHAH,INDIAN OIL PROP @ VIMALKUMAR ARUNBHAI GANDHI vs BHAVINKUMAR CHHABILDAS PATEL Advocate - D K UPADHYAYA — 1811/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR060019902024

Filing Number

1811/2024

Filing Date

18-Nov-2024

Registration No

1811/2024

Registration Date

18-Nov-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS.D C SHAH,INDIAN OIL PROP @ VIMALKUMAR ARUNBHAI GANDHI

    Adv. J A SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVINKUMAR CHHABILDAS PATEL Advocate - D K UPADHYAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed the accused's appeal and upheld the conviction, ordering the accused to pay court fees. The judgment, dated March 14, 2026, was pronounced in the District Court of Surat and is effective from the date of pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    For order

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  19. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  20. 21-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  21. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  22. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  23. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  24. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  25. 23-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1811/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the accused's appeal and upheld the conviction, ordering the accused to pay court fees. The judgment, dated March 14, 2026, was pronounced in the District Court of Surat and is effective from the date of pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case