ASHISHBHAI MANILALBHAI CHAUDHARI vs GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT — 39/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR060004332026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

39/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE And ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214032260238

Police Station

MANDVI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 480,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65E,116B

Petitioner(s)

ASHISHBHAI MANILALBHAI CHAUDHARI

Adv. D K UPADHYAYA

Respondent(s)

GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE And ADDL. CJM

07-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Mandvi, Surat granted bail to the accused Anil Miladbhai Chowdhury in a case involving possession of Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Sections 65(I) and 116(b). The court approved the bail application, setting bail at Rs. 50,000 with a local surety bond of equal amount, after considering that this is a first offense, the accused has family ties in the locality, and prolonged custody would burden his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Mandvi, Surat granted bail to the accused Anil Miladbhai Chowdhury in a case involving possession of Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Sections 65(I) and 116(b). The court approved the bail application, setting bail at Rs. 50,000 with a local surety bond of equal amount, after considering that this is a first offense, the accused has family ties in the locality, and prolonged custody would burden his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANDVI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case