Government of Gujarat vs SHUKKARIYABHAI KASMABHAI KATHUDIYA Advocate - S G CHAUDHARI — 143/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR060001522025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
143/2025
Filing Date
31-01-2025
Registration No
143/2025
Registration Date
31-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANDVI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE And ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214032241325
Police Station
MANDVI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHUKKARIYABHAI KASMABHAI KATHUDIYA Advocate - S G CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE And ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ORDER
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ORDER | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Case: C.C.NO-143/2025 (Mandvi Magistrate Court, Surat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Sukkarbhai Kasmabhai Kathudia, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(A) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly or negligently, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and the identity of the motorcycle rider remained unproven. Key Finding: While the injured party sustained documented injuries in a road accident, the evidence did not conclusively prove the accused's culpability for rash or negligent driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary Case: C.C.NO-143/2025 (Mandvi Magistrate Court, Surat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Sukkarbhai Kasmabhai Kathudia, of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(A) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove the vehicle recklessly or negligently, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and the identity of the motorcycle rider remained unproven. Key Finding: While the injured party sustained documented injuries in a road accident, the evidence did not conclusively prove the accused's culpability for rash or negligent driving. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts