Government of Gujarat vs MANUBHAI MAGANBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M D VASAVA — 3652/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050042772025
Filing Number
3652/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
3652/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214033250554
Police Station
MANGROL POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANUBHAI MAGANBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M D VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 3652/2025 Summary The court convicted Manubhai Maganbhai Vasava under the Gambling Act Section 12(a) for gambling in a public place for personal gain. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime after being informed of his rights and maximum penalties. Considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, remorse, and assurance of reform, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹500 (or one day simple imprisonment if unpaid), showing leniency toward rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 3652/2025 Summary The court convicted Manubhai Maganbhai Vasava under the Gambling Act Section 12(a) for gambling in a public place for personal gain. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime after being informed of his rights and maximum penalties. Considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, remorse, and assurance of reform, the court sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹500 (or one day simple imprisonment if unpaid), showing leniency toward rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts