Government of Gujarat vs HASMUKHBHAI BABUBHAI GOHIL — 3531/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050041532025
Filing Number
3531/2025
Filing Date
17-11-2025
Registration No
3531/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250641
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HASMUKHBHAI BABUBHAI GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FRAMING OF CHARGE
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 3531/2025 The court found Hasmukhbhai Babubhai Gohil guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his genuine remorse, first-time offense, and assurance of future compliance with law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,500 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, giving him an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3531/2025 The court found Hasmukhbhai Babubhai Gohil guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his genuine remorse, first-time offense, and assurance of future compliance with law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 1,500 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, giving him an opportunity for reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts