Government of Gujarat vs JINABHAI GABHARUBHAI MALKIYAMIR — 3483/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,324(4). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050041042025
Filing Number
3483/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
3483/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250927
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JINABHAI GABHARUBHAI MALKIYAMIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found Jinabhai Gabharubhai Malkiyamir guilty under IPC sections 281, 324(4) and MV Act sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary admission, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹4,000 fine and time-served imprisonment, below the statutory minimum, citing rehabilitation prospects and equitable justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3483/2025
The court found Jinabhai Gabharubhai Malkiyamir guilty under IPC sections 281, 324(4) and MV Act sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary admission, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹4,000 fine and time-served imprisonment, below the statutory minimum, citing rehabilitation prospects and equitable justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts