Government of Gujarat vs SANTOSH DASHRATHBHAI AHIRE Advocate - T I PARMAR — 3472/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b,324(5). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 26th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050040932025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3472/2025

Filing Date

15-11-2025

Registration No

3472/2025

Registration Date

15-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251081

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b,324(5)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SANTOSH DASHRATHBHAI AHIRE Advocate - T I PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

26-05-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

02-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

26-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC No. 3472/2025 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangrole acquitted accused Santosh Dashrathbhai Ahire of criminal charges under IPC Sections 281, 324(4) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 relating to a vehicle collision on July 12, 2025. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's bus caused damage to an ST bus, as key witnesses (including the ST bus conductor) could not definitively confirm the accused's vehicle was responsible or provide credible evidence of fault. The court granted benefit of doubt under Section 271(1) BNS and ordered the accused released on bail of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 3472/2025 The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangrole acquitted accused Santosh Dashrathbhai Ahire of criminal charges under IPC Sections 281, 324(4) and MV Act Sections 177, 184 relating to a vehicle collision on July 12, 2025. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's bus caused damage to an ST bus, as key witnesses (including the ST bus conductor) could not definitively confirm the accused's vehicle was responsible or provide credible evidence of fault. The court granted benefit of doubt under Section 271(1) BNS and ordered the accused released on bail of Rs. 15,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case