Government of Gujarat vs RAMESH KALIKA PASVAN Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 3471/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,324(5). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 27th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050040922025
Filing Number
3471/2025
Filing Date
15-11-2025
Registration No
3471/2025
Registration Date
15-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
27th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021251139
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMESH KALIKA PASVAN Advocate - V D MAISURIA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 18-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 3471/2025 The court found Ramesh Kalika Pasvan guilty under IPC Sections 281, 324(5), and MPC Sections 177, 184. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse, assuring the court of no future offenses. Applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences than the statutory minimum when justified by mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a fine of ₹4,000 and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the voluntary confession and genuine repentance as grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3471/2025 The court found Ramesh Kalika Pasvan guilty under IPC Sections 281, 324(5), and MPC Sections 177, 184. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse, assuring the court of no future offenses. Applying the principle that courts may impose lesser sentences than the statutory minimum when justified by mitigating circumstances, the court imposed a fine of ₹4,000 and imprisonment until the rising of court, considering the voluntary confession and genuine repentance as grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts