Government of Gujarat vs MAYUR HIRALAL BHALE Advocate - H D VASAVA — 3434/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 20th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050040522025
Filing Number
3434/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
3434/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250399
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAYUR HIRALAL BHALE Advocate - H D VASAVA
DILIP MOHANBHAI CHAVDA
Adv. H A NAKHUDA
RAJESH HARLAL GAUD
Adv. H A NAKHUDA
TAJUDDIN AZAD KHAN PATHAN
Adv. H A NAKHUDA
AKHTAR ALI - AKKU HASAM ALI ARAB
Adv. H A NAKHUDA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 3434/2025 The court found accused Mayur Hiralal Bhale guilty of gambling under the Gambling Act, Section 12, after he voluntarily confessed to engaging in gambling for personal gain at a public place. The court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor economic circumstances and expression of remorse as grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 3434/2025 The court found accused Mayur Hiralal Bhale guilty of gambling under the Gambling Act, Section 12, after he voluntarily confessed to engaging in gambling for personal gain at a public place. The court convicted him and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 or one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor economic circumstances and expression of remorse as grounds for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts