Government of Gujarat vs SHAHBAN ALI IMTIYAJ AHAMAD SHAIKH — 3399/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050040162025
Filing Number
3399/2025
Filing Date
12-Nov-2025
Registration No
3399/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250725
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAHBAN ALI IMTIYAJ AHAMAD SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the defendant guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita after the defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the defendant's remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time served plus a fine of ₹1,000, with one day of simple imprisonment as default punishment, exercising its discretion to award below the statutory minimum sentence in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3399/2025
The court found the defendant guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(A), 125(B) and relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita after the defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the defendant's remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time served plus a fine of ₹1,000, with one day of simple imprisonment as default punishment, exercising its discretion to award below the statutory minimum sentence in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts