Government of Gujarat vs SOHAN KANARAM GURJAR Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 3385/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,324(5). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050040022025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3385/2025

Filing Date

12-11-2025

Registration No

3385/2025

Registration Date

12-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021250846

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,324(5)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SOHAN KANARAM GURJAR Advocate - V D MAISURIA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

05-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

08-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

17-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mangarol found the accused Sohan Kanaram Gurjar guilty under IPC sections 281, 125(a), and 324(5), and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of the court proceedings plus a fine of ₹4,000, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum based on the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, applying the principle that courts may impose lenient punishment when sufficient grounds exist and the interests of justice warrant rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mangarol found the accused Sohan Kanaram Gurjar guilty under IPC sections 281, 125(a), and 324(5), and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of the court proceedings plus a fine of ₹4,000, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum based on the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, applying the principle that courts may impose lenient punishment when sufficient grounds exist and the interests of justice warrant rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case