Government of Gujarat vs YOGENDRA SHREE NANHELAL YADAV Advocate - Z D PARMAR — 3205/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050038132025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3205/2025

Filing Date

06-11-2025

Registration No

3205/2025

Registration Date

06-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251039

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

YOGENDRA SHREE NANHELAL YADAV Advocate - Z D PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

17-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Yogendra Shree Nanhelal Yadav, under IPC Section 281 and CrPC Sections 177 and 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,500 (with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative) instead of the minimum statutory punishment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, citing the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Nathvar Harichandra Thakore that courts have discretion to impose lesser sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Yogendra Shree Nanhelal Yadav, under IPC Section 281 and CrPC Sections 177 and 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,500 (with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative) instead of the minimum statutory punishment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, citing the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Nathvar Harichandra Thakore that courts have discretion to impose lesser sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case