Government of Gujarat vs YOGENDRA SHREE NANHELAL YADAV Advocate - Z D PARMAR — 3205/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050038132025
Filing Number
3205/2025
Filing Date
06-11-2025
Registration No
3205/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021251039
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
YOGENDRA SHREE NANHELAL YADAV Advocate - Z D PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 17-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Yogendra Shree Nanhelal Yadav, under IPC Section 281 and CrPC Sections 177 and 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,500 (with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative) instead of the minimum statutory punishment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, citing the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Nathvar Harichandra Thakore that courts have discretion to impose lesser sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused, Yogendra Shree Nanhelal Yadav, under IPC Section 281 and CrPC Sections 177 and 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of a fine of ₹1,500 (with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative) instead of the minimum statutory punishment, considering the accused's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, citing the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Nathvar Harichandra Thakore that courts have discretion to impose lesser sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts