Government of Gujarat vs NADIM NIZAMBHAI SHAIKH — 3141/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050037492025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3141/2025

Filing Date

04-11-2025

Registration No

3141/2025

Registration Date

04-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251124

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 285,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NADIM NIZAMBHAI SHAIKH

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PLEA

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger to life or property) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lesser sentence than the minimum prescribed by law, considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors warranting leniency in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger to life or property) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lesser sentence than the minimum prescribed by law, considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors warranting leniency in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case