Government of Gujarat vs ATULKUMAR RAJBAHADUR RAJPUT — 2924/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050035032025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2924/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
2924/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250350
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ATULKUMAR RAJBAHADUR RAJPUT
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 04-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused guilty under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and expressed remorse, so the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the close of court proceedings and a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), exercising discretion to impose less than the statutory minimum punishment given the circumstances and confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused guilty under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and expressed remorse, so the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the close of court proceedings and a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid), exercising discretion to impose less than the statutory minimum punishment given the circumstances and confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts