Government of Gujarat vs MEHULBHAI SURABHAI MIR — 2407/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050029132025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2407/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
2407/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250898
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MEHULBHAI SURABHAI MIR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 03-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangarol, convicted the accused under BNS Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until rising of court and imposed a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day in case of default in payment, applying discretionary leniency below the statutory minimum sentence given the accused's remorse, voluntary plea, and assurance against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangarol, convicted the accused under BNS Section 285 (negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until rising of court and imposed a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day in case of default in payment, applying discretionary leniency below the statutory minimum sentence given the accused's remorse, voluntary plea, and assurance against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts