Government of Gujarat vs ASHOKBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J N CHAUDHARI — 2383/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050028862025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2383/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
2383/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021250798
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASHOKBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J N CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 16-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the defendant guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of court proceedings plus a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum based on the defendant's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, exercising judicial discretion to reform rather than punish harshly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the defendant guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of court proceedings plus a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum based on the defendant's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, exercising judicial discretion to reform rather than punish harshly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts