Government of Gujarat vs ASHOKBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J N CHAUDHARI — 2383/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050028862025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2383/2025

Filing Date

30-08-2025

Registration No

2383/2025

Registration Date

30-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021250798

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 285,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ASHOKBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J N CHAUDHARI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

31-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court found the defendant guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of court proceedings plus a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum based on the defendant's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, exercising judicial discretion to reform rather than punish harshly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the defendant guilty under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) and sentenced him to imprisonment until the end of court proceedings plus a fine of ₹1,000, with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lighter sentence than the statutory minimum based on the defendant's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, exercising judicial discretion to reform rather than punish harshly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case