Government of Gujarat vs ARAVINDBHAI PARVATBHAI SANGADA — 440/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050006082026

Filing Number

440/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

440/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214033250749

Police Station

MANGROL POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARAVINDBHAI PARVATBHAI SANGADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), rather than the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for drunk driving. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 1,000 (with 2 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), rather than the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case