Government of Gujarat vs ABUTALIM ABDULBHAI PATHAN — 439/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050006072026

Filing Number

439/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

439/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251664

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABUTALIM ABDULBHAI PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's remorse, voluntary admission, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 200/-, which is below the statutory minimum, citing the principles of restorative justice and the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under BNS Section 285 (negligent act causing danger) after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering the accused's remorse, voluntary admission, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of Rs. 200/-, which is below the statutory minimum, citing the principles of restorative justice and the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case