Government of Gujarat vs HASANKHAN SHERKHAN PATHAN — 435/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050006032026

Filing Number

435/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

435/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251665

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASANKHAN SHERKHAN PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 285 after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine is not paid. The court exercised discretion to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance not to commit further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 435/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under BNS Section 285 after the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of ₹200, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine is not paid. The court exercised discretion to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse, and assurance not to commit further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case