Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI THAKORBHAI RATHOD — 434/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12a. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050006012026

Filing Number

434/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

434/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214033250774

Police Station

MANGROL POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARJUNBHAI THAKORBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under Section 12(A) of the Gambling Act for gambling in a public place for personal gain. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 200, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's poverty, voluntary confession, and remorse. Seized gambling materials were ordered to be forfeited to the government and destroyed, except items already returned by the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Section 12(A) of the Gambling Act for gambling in a public place for personal gain. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 200, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's poverty, voluntary confession, and remorse. Seized gambling materials were ordered to be forfeited to the government and destroyed, except items already returned by the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case