Government of Gujarat vs SHANKARBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR — 422/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050005892026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
422/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
422/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHANKARBHAI RAMESHBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court found the accused guilty under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession. Considering the accused's remorse, voluntary plea, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till court closure and a fine of Rs. 200, departing from the minimum statutory punishment to provide the accused an opportunity for reformation. Seized valuable items were ordered to be returned to their rightful owner or forfeited to the government as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court found the accused guilty under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession. Considering the accused's remorse, voluntary plea, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till court closure and a fine of Rs. 200, departing from the minimum statutory punishment to provide the accused an opportunity for reformation. Seized valuable items were ordered to be returned to their rightful owner or forfeited to the government as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts