Government of Gujarat vs SUNITABEN JITESHBHAI VASAVA — 387/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050005502026

Filing Number

387/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

387/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNITABEN JITESHBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession of guilt. The court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court rises (time served) and a fine of ₹200, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's remorse, first offense, and assurance of future compliance. Seized valuable articles were ordered to be returned to their rightful owners or forfeited to the government as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession of guilt. The court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the court rises (time served) and a fine of ₹200, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's remorse, first offense, and assurance of future compliance. Seized valuable articles were ordered to be returned to their rightful owners or forfeited to the government as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case