Government of Gujarat vs Anil haribhai vamja Advocate - J N GOHIL — 365/2021
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,98. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050003712021
Filing Number
365/2021
Filing Date
08-Jan-2021
Registration No
365/2021
Registration Date
08-Jan-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
2-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil haribhai vamja Advocate - J N GOHIL
-
2.Kartikbhai Jamanbhai Patel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: 365/2021 Court Decision: The court acquitted the two accused (Anil Haribhai Vamja and Kartikbhai Jamanbhai Patel) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(E), 81, and 98(2), giving them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: Although foreign liquor (428 bottles worth ₹70,680) was seized during a police raid on May 4, 2019, the prosecution's case was based primarily on police testimony and weak witness corroboration. The court found that the independent witnesses (panchas) present during the seizure did not adequately support the prosecution narrative, noting critical procedural gaps including lack of proper panch-nama (formal seizure document) prepared in their presence and absence of corroborating independent evidence connecting the accused to the contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
02-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Sep-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-May-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2021
Further Statement
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Sep-2021
Further Statement
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Sep-2021
Further Statement
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
22-Sep-2021
Further Statement
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Sep-2021
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Aug-2021
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 365/2021
Case Summary: 365/2021 Court Decision: The court acquitted the two accused (Anil Haribhai Vamja and Kartikbhai Jamanbhai Patel) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(E), 81, and 98(2), giving them the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: Although foreign liquor (428 bottles worth ₹70,680) was seized during a police raid on May 4, 2019, the prosecution's case was based primarily on police testimony and weak witness corroboration. The court found that the independent witnesses (panchas) present during the seizure did not adequately support the prosecution narrative, noting critical procedural gaps including lack of proper panch-nama (formal seizure document) prepared in their presence and absence of corroborating independent evidence connecting the accused to the contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts