Government of Gujarat vs LATABEN BHARATBHAI VASAVA — 171/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050003112026

Filing Number

171/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

171/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATABEN BHARATBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the defendant guilty under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, citing the defendant's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, while ordering confiscated contraband to be returned to its rightful owner or forfeited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the defendant guilty under Section 65 AA of the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment until the rising of the court plus a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, citing the defendant's voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, while ordering confiscated contraband to be returned to its rightful owner or forfeited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case