Government of Gujarat vs JAKIR BASHIR PINJARI Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 122/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050002332026

Case disposed

Filing Number

122/2026

Filing Date

07-02-2026

Registration No

122/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251480

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAKIR BASHIR PINJARI Advocate - V D MAISURIA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
ORDER

The court found the accused, Jakir Bashir Pinjari, guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid), exercising its discretion to award sub-minimum punishment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Jakir Bashir Pinjari, guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid), exercising its discretion to award sub-minimum punishment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case