Government of Gujarat vs JAKIR BASHIR PINJARI Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 122/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050002332026

Filing Number

122/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

122/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251480

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAKIR BASHIR PINJARI Advocate - V D MAISURIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused, Jakir Bashir Pinjari, guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid), exercising its discretion to award sub-minimum punishment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Jakir Bashir Pinjari, guilty under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering his remorse, voluntary confession, and assurance against future offenses, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if fine remains unpaid), exercising its discretion to award sub-minimum punishment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case