Government of Gujarat vs FAIZUDDIN JAMILUDDIN SAIYAD Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 107/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050002172026

Case disposed

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251478

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

FAIZUDDIN JAMILUDDIN SAIYAD Advocate - V D MAISURIA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

18-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused, Faizuddin Jamiluddin Saiyad, under IPC sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and CrPC sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse. Citing the precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when sufficient grounds exist, the judge sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 1,500 with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Faizuddin Jamiluddin Saiyad, under IPC sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and CrPC sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse. Citing the precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when sufficient grounds exist, the judge sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 1,500 with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case