Government of Gujarat vs FAIZUDDIN JAMILUDDIN SAIYAD Advocate - V D MAISURIA — 107/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125ab. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050002172026
Filing Number
107/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
107/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021251478
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.FAIZUDDIN JAMILUDDIN SAIYAD Advocate - V D MAISURIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused, Faizuddin Jamiluddin Saiyad, under IPC sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and CrPC sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse. Citing the precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when sufficient grounds exist, the judge sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 1,500 with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 107/2026
The court convicted the accused, Faizuddin Jamiluddin Saiyad, under IPC sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and CrPC sections 177, 184, after he voluntarily confessed to the charges and expressed remorse. Citing the precedent that courts may impose lesser sentences when sufficient grounds exist, the judge sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 1,500 with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his voluntary confession and assurance of future good conduct as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts