Government of Gujarat vs JITENDRASING KHUSHIRAMSING JAT Advocate - G.S.PARMAR — 163/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 505(b)(c). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR050001882023
Filing Number
163/2023
Filing Date
18-Jan-2023
Registration No
163/2023
Registration Date
18-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
2-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214021220914
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITENDRASING KHUSHIRAMSING JAT Advocate - G.S.PARMAR
-
2.MAHESHBHAI MAHETLAL LAJEVAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 163/2023 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangarol court acquitted both accused (Jitendrasing Khushiramsing Jat and Maheshbhai Mahetlal Lajevad) of charges under IPC Section 505(b)(c) (spreading rumors causing public fear) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused made the alleged telephonic conversation audio clip that went viral, as the actual audio clip was never produced before the court as evidence, voice samples were never collected from the accused for comparison, and the mobile phone FSL report was never submitted despite being forwarded for forensic examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
24-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
20-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 163/2023
Case Summary: 163/2023 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mangarol court acquitted both accused (Jitendrasing Khushiramsing Jat and Maheshbhai Mahetlal Lajevad) of charges under IPC Section 505(b)(c) (spreading rumors causing public fear) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused made the alleged telephonic conversation audio clip that went viral, as the actual audio clip was never produced before the court as evidence, voice samples were never collected from the accused for comparison, and the mobile phone FSL report was never submitted despite being forwarded for forensic examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts