Government of Gujarat vs OMPRAKASH KESHARAM DHAKA Advocate - K I PARMAR — 34/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050000732026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214021251346

Police Station

KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125a,125b
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OMPRAKASH KESHARAM DHAKA Advocate - K I PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 34/2026 The court convicted the defendant under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b) and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134 after the defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid)—below the statutory minimum—citing the principle that courts may impose reduced sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 34/2026 The court convicted the defendant under IPC Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b) and CrPC Sections 177, 184, 134 after the defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges. Considering the voluntary confession, genuine remorse, and assurance of future good conduct, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until rising of court and a fine of ₹4,000 (with one day simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid)—below the statutory minimum—citing the principle that courts may impose reduced sentences when substantial and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case