DGVCL vs FARIDA FARUK MULLA — 18/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR050000632026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DGVCL
Adv. J B GOHIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.FARIDA FARUK MULLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS 18/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mangrol (Surat) partly allowed DGVCL's suit against defendant Farida Faruk Mulla for electricity bill recovery. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 1,21,586-41/- (the disputed electricity bill amount arising from illegal wire connection/electricity theft detected during inspection) plus 9% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 16% interest rate due to insufficient documentary proof of the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2026
Case Summary: RCS 18/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mangrol (Surat) partly allowed DGVCL's suit against defendant Farida Faruk Mulla for electricity bill recovery. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 1,21,586-41/- (the disputed electricity bill amount arising from illegal wire connection/electricity theft detected during inspection) plus 9% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 16% interest rate due to insufficient documentary proof of the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts