DGVCL vs MURAD MEHTAB TADAVI — 17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR050000622026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DGVCL

    Adv. J B GOHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MURAD MEHTAB TADAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: DGVCL v. Murad Mehtab Tadavi (RCS 17/2026) The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,24,195.29 against the defendant for unpaid electricity bills. The defendant, caught illegally connected to an extra wire constituting electricity theft, had been issued a bill of Rs. 91,687.68 plus accumulated charges, but failed to pay despite notice. The court upheld the principal amount but reduced the claimed interest rate from 16% to 9% per annum, finding the plaintiff had not adequately documented the higher rate or the delayed payment charges (DPC). The defendant was ordered to pay the full amount with simple interest from the suit filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DGVCL v. Murad Mehtab Tadavi (RCS 17/2026) The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 1,24,195.29 against the defendant for unpaid electricity bills. The defendant, caught illegally connected to an extra wire constituting electricity theft, had been issued a bill of Rs. 91,687.68 plus accumulated charges, but failed to pay despite notice. The court upheld the principal amount but reduced the claimed interest rate from 16% to 9% per annum, finding the plaintiff had not adequately documented the higher rate or the delayed payment charges (DPC). The defendant was ordered to pay the full amount with simple interest from the suit filing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case