DGVCL vs KHODIYA IMRAN MOHAMAD HANIF — 10/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR050000482026

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DGVCL

    Adv. J B GOHIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHODIYA IMRAN MOHAMAD HANIF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: RCS 10/2026 Decision: The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit against defendant Khodiya Imran Mohamad Hanif for recovery of electricity dues. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 1,97,040-19/- with simple interest at 9% per annum from the filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed interest rate of 16-18% as excessive. The court confirmed the electricity bill amount but found insufficient documentary evidence for the delay payment charges calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 10/2026 Decision: The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit against defendant Khodiya Imran Mohamad Hanif for recovery of electricity dues. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 1,97,040-19/- with simple interest at 9% per annum from the filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed interest rate of 16-18% as excessive. The court confirmed the electricity bill amount but found insufficient documentary evidence for the delay payment charges calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case