DGVCL vs HANSABEN BHAGUBHAI — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR050000462026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DGVCL
Adv. J B GOHIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.HANSABEN BHAGUBHAI
-
2.AYUB SULEMAN ARCHHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 8/2026 The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for electricity bill recovery against defendants Hansaben Bhagubhai Malek and Ayub Suleman Archha. The court decreed that defendants pay Rs. 1,54,933-06 (the outstanding electricity bill arising from detected electricity theft through illegal wire connection) plus 9% simple interest per annum from suit filing date, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 16% interest due to insufficient documentary evidence of the agreed rate. The defendants were also ordered to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
Case Summary: RCS 8/2026 The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for electricity bill recovery against defendants Hansaben Bhagubhai Malek and Ayub Suleman Archha. The court decreed that defendants pay Rs. 1,54,933-06 (the outstanding electricity bill arising from detected electricity theft through illegal wire connection) plus 9% simple interest per annum from suit filing date, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 16% interest due to insufficient documentary evidence of the agreed rate. The defendants were also ordered to bear court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts