DGVCL vs MOHAMAD RIYAZ IQBAL BOBAT — 7/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR050000452026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANGROL
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DGVCL
Adv. J B GOHIL
Respondent(s)
MOHAMAD RIYAZ IQBAL BOBAT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 05-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 7/2026 The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for electricity bill recovery against defendant Mohamad Riyaz Iqbal Bobat. The defendant was caught illegally bypassing his meter and committing electricity theft during a January 2024 inspection. The court awarded the full outstanding amount of Rs. 1,39,213.70 (comprising Rs. 1,09,080.12 for the theft bill plus Rs. 30,100.48 in delayed payment charges), but reduced the plaintiff's claimed 16% interest to 9% per annum, finding the higher rate unsubstantiated and excessive under prevailing bank rates and the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 7/2026 The court partially allowed DGVCL's suit for electricity bill recovery against defendant Mohamad Riyaz Iqbal Bobat. The defendant was caught illegally bypassing his meter and committing electricity theft during a January 2024 inspection. The court awarded the full outstanding amount of Rs. 1,39,213.70 (comprising Rs. 1,09,080.12 for the theft bill plus Rs. 30,100.48 in delayed payment charges), but reduced the plaintiff's claimed 16% interest to 9% per annum, finding the higher rate unsubstantiated and excessive under prevailing bank rates and the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts