Government of Gujarat vs BUDHANPRASAD PANDEVPRASAD KEVAT — 4515/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66,1(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR030057552025

Filing Number

4516/2025

Filing Date

31-Dec-2025

Registration No

4515/2025

Registration Date

31-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD

Judge

1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214068250199

Police Station

KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66,1(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BUDHANPRASAD PANDEVPRASAD KEVAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 4515/2025 The court convicted Budhanprasad Pandevprasad Kevat under the Prohibition Act, Sections 85 and 66(1)(b) for being found intoxicated in public without a valid permit. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and claimed it was his first offense with no criminal intent. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4515/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 4515/2025 The court convicted Budhanprasad Pandevprasad Kevat under the Prohibition Act, Sections 85 and 66(1)(b) for being found intoxicated in public without a valid permit. The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty and claimed it was his first offense with no criminal intent. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case