Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI MAHNATO — 4509/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,661(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR030057492025

Filing Number

4510/2025

Filing Date

31-Dec-2025

Registration No

4509/2025

Registration Date

31-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD

Judge

1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214068250201

Police Station

KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,661(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYBHAI MAHNATO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Sanjaybhai Mahnato under the Prohibition Act (Sections 85, 66(1)(b)) for consuming alcohol without a permit and being found intoxicated in public. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court, considering this was his first offense and his lack of criminal intent, sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4509/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Sanjaybhai Mahnato under the Prohibition Act (Sections 85, 66(1)(b)) for consuming alcohol without a permit and being found intoxicated in public. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court, considering this was his first offense and his lack of criminal intent, sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case