Government of Gujarat vs KAPURCHAND SHIVRATAN MAHANTO — 4506/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85, 661(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR030057462025

Case disposed

Filing Number

4507/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2025

Registration No

4506/2025

Registration Date

31-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD

Judge

1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214068250200

Police Station

KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85, 661(B)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KAPURCHAND SHIVRATAN MAHANTO

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

27-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Case 4506/2025 The court convicted Kapurchand Shivratan Mahanto under the Prohibition Act sections 85 and 66(1)(B) for consuming and publicly possessing alcohol without proper permit in Kanyasi village, Olpad. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, representing it as his first offense with no criminal intent and assurance against future violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 4506/2025 The court convicted Kapurchand Shivratan Mahanto under the Prohibition Act sections 85 and 66(1)(B) for consuming and publicly possessing alcohol without proper permit in Kanyasi village, Olpad. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, representing it as his first offense with no criminal intent and assurance against future violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case