Government of Gujarat vs KAPURCHAND SHIVRATAN MAHANTO — 4506/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85, 661(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR030057462025
Filing Number
4507/2025
Filing Date
31-Dec-2025
Registration No
4506/2025
Registration Date
31-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214068250200
Police Station
KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAPURCHAND SHIVRATAN MAHANTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: Case 4506/2025 The court convicted Kapurchand Shivratan Mahanto under the Prohibition Act sections 85 and 66(1)(B) for consuming and publicly possessing alcohol without proper permit in Kanyasi village, Olpad. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, representing it as his first offense with no criminal intent and assurance against future violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
23-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4506/2025
Case Summary: Case 4506/2025 The court convicted Kapurchand Shivratan Mahanto under the Prohibition Act sections 85 and 66(1)(B) for consuming and publicly possessing alcohol without proper permit in Kanyasi village, Olpad. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, representing it as his first offense with no criminal intent and assurance against future violations. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's circumstances and first-time nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts