Government of Gujarat vs JAYSHRIBEN WIFE OF RAKESHBHAI PITAMBARBHAI BAVISHKAR Advocate - J C PATEL — 3600/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),333,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR030046732025
Filing Number
3600/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
3600/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214068250686
Police Station
KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYSHRIBEN WIFE OF RAKESHBHAI PITAMBARBHAI BAVISHKAR Advocate - J C PATEL
-
2.SANGITABEN RATILAL VITTHALBHAI SAVANT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 3600/2025 Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Jayshriben and Sangitaben) of all charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, and 54, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Key Reasoning: The complainant and key witness testified that normal conversation occurred, followed by accidental pushing and falling that caused injuries—contradicting allegations of intentional assault and threats. The prosecution failed to prove the criminal allegations beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the defendants to benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
30-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3600/2025
Case Summary: 3600/2025 Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Jayshriben and Sangitaben) of all charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333, and 54, finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Key Reasoning: The complainant and key witness testified that normal conversation occurred, followed by accidental pushing and falling that caused injuries—contradicting allegations of intentional assault and threats. The prosecution failed to prove the criminal allegations beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the defendants to benefit of doubt under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts