Government of Gujarat vs RAHULBHAI NAGINBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R G PARMAR — 3472/2023

Case under Prisons Act, 1894 Section 51A,51B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR030042422023

Filing Number

3473/2023

Filing Date

13-Oct-2023

Registration No

3472/2023

Registration Date

13-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD

Judge

1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214068220596

Police Station

KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Prisons Act, 1894 Section 51A,51B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHULBHAI NAGINBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R G PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found accused Rahulbhai Naginbhai Parmar guilty of offenses under Prisons Act sections 51-A and 51-B based on a chargesheet and the accused's voluntary plea of guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as his first offense and his assurance against future wrongdoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 27-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 16-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 14-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 28-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 17-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 06-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 26-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 13-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3472/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Rahulbhai Naginbhai Parmar guilty of offenses under Prisons Act sections 51-A and 51-B based on a chargesheet and the accused's voluntary plea of guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative punishment of two days' simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering it as his first offense and his assurance against future wrongdoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case