Government of Gujarat vs NIRUBEN MANHARBHAI HIMMATBHAI NAYAKA Advocate - R G PARMAR — 3330/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),81,116(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR030040832023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3331/2023
Filing Date
05-10-2023
Registration No
3330/2023
Registration Date
05-10-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214042230814
Police Station
OLPAD POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NIRUBEN MANHARBHAI HIMMATBHAI NAYAKA Advocate - R G PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) of Olpad, Gujarat acquitted the defendant Niruben of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(I), 81, and 116(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that foreign liquor bottles recovered from her residence were in her possession. The court noted critical evidential gaps: independent witness corroboration was absent, FSL reports were not produced, proper panchnama procedures were not followed, and no company representatives were examined to authenticate the seized goods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) of Olpad, Gujarat acquitted the defendant Niruben of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 65(I), 81, and 116(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that foreign liquor bottles recovered from her residence were in her possession. The court noted critical evidential gaps: independent witness corroboration was absent, FSL reports were not produced, proper panchnama procedures were not followed, and no company representatives were examined to authenticate the seized goods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts