Government of Gujarat vs THE OLPAD GROUP CO. OP. COTTON SALE SOCIETY LTD. — 2091/2025
Case under The Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985 Section 19A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR030026682025
Filing Number
2091/2025
Filing Date
05-Jul-2025
Registration No
2091/2025
Registration Date
05-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE OLPAD GROUP CO. OP. COTTON SALE SOCIETY LTD.
-
2.JAYESHBHAI BALUBHAI PATEL
-
3.DHARTI AGRO
-
4.SANMUKHBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PATEL
-
5.DHARMAJ CROP GUARD LIMITED
-
6.VISHAL HARIBHAI DOMADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the three respondents under the Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1955 for illegally displaying and selling agricultural produce without authorization. Each accused was sentenced to imprisonment for up to court appearance, fined ₹10,000 per person (total ₹60,000), with accused nos. 2, 4, and 6 receiving additional imprisonment of one month if fines remain unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2091/2025
The court convicted the three respondents under the Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1955 for illegally displaying and selling agricultural produce without authorization. Each accused was sentenced to imprisonment for up to court appearance, fined ₹10,000 per person (total ₹60,000), with accused nos. 2, 4, and 6 receiving additional imprisonment of one month if fines remain unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts