Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI MOHANBHAI RATHOD — 2065/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--ABATED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR030026422025

Filing Number

2065/2025

Filing Date

04-Jul-2025

Registration No

2065/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, OLPAD

Judge

1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ABATED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214068250386

Police Station

KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI MOHANBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court ruled that the accused should be acquitted as the case against him lacked sufficient evidence. The judgment found that the accusations made by the complainant were not substantiated and that the accused had not committed the offense as alleged, therefore ordering his discharge from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  9. 06-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 04-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2065/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court ruled that the accused should be acquitted as the case against him lacked sufficient evidence. The judgment found that the accusations made by the complainant were not substantiated and that the accused had not committed the offense as alleged, therefore ordering his discharge from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case