Government of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI JODHABHAI MALAKIYA — 1794/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR030023532025
Filing Number
1794/2025
Filing Date
02-Jul-2025
Registration No
1794/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
1-Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214068250410
Police Station
KIM POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVINDBHAI JODHABHAI MALAKIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed the criminal case against Govindbhai Jodhabhai Malakiya under CrPC Section 258, finding that the investigation agency failed to produce the accused despite a chargesheet being filed, and there was no likelihood of the accused appearing for trial in the foreseeable future. The court ruled that continuing proceedings would not serve justice and ordered the case closed, while preserving the prosecution's right to restore proceedings if the accused is later apprehended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
02-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
19-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
27-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM
-
06-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1794/2025
The court dismissed the criminal case against Govindbhai Jodhabhai Malakiya under CrPC Section 258, finding that the investigation agency failed to produce the accused despite a chargesheet being filed, and there was no likelihood of the accused appearing for trial in the foreseeable future. The court ruled that continuing proceedings would not serve justice and ordered the case closed, while preserving the prosecution's right to restore proceedings if the accused is later apprehended. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts