Lakshmiben Dolatsinh Devdhara vs Sitaben WD/O Abhesinh Devadhra Advocate - M.D.MAHIDA — 165/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,22,31,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR030012872018
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
165/2018
Filing Date
29-05-2018
Registration No
165/2018
Registration Date
16-02-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, OLPAD
Judge
1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmiben Dolatsinh Devdhara
Adv. P.R.PATEL
Rajendrasinh Dolatsinh Devdhara
Jitendrasinh Dolatsinh Devdhara
Respondent(s)
Sitaben WD/O Abhesinh Devadhra Advocate - M.D.MAHIDA
Ganpatsinh Abhesinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
IndrajitSinh Ganpatsinh devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Sudhaben Ganpatsinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Minaxiben Ganpatsinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Kanuben Ganpatsinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Pravinsinh Ganpatsinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Dolatsinh Abhesinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Chandrasinh Abhesinh Devdhara
Surendrasinh Abhesinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Kamleshkumar Surendrasinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Jayendrasinh Surendrasinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Dharmendrasinh Surendrasinh Devdhara
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Manjulaben D/O Abhesinh Devdhara W/O Kanaksinh Khumansinh Thakorsinh
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Ranjanben D/O Abhesinh Devdhara W/O Vijaysinh Chandrasinh Vatachiya
Adv. M.D.MAHIDA
Bhartiben D/O Abhesinh Devdhara W/O Jashwantsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki
Bhagvatibhai Jagjivanbhai Patel
Adv. A.B.PATEL
Sandipkumar Bhagvatibhai Patel
Adv. A.B.PATEL
Bhanuben @ Bhikhiben Ranchodbhai
Adv. A.B.PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (interlocutory order petition) for want of a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish all three mandatory ingredients required under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC, 1908, for granting an interim injunction regarding disputed agricultural and residential properties in Surat district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (interlocutory order petition) for want of a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish all three mandatory ingredients required under Order 39, Rules 1-2 of the CPC, 1908, for granting an interim injunction regarding disputed agricultural and residential properties in Surat district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts