SATYABADI NAYAK PROP OF ARNAPURNA TEXTILE vs SHILPA RAJESH SHAH Advocate - H G RABARI — 830/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSR010144562025
Filing Number
831/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
830/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
7-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYABADI NAYAK PROP OF ARNAPURNA TEXTILE
Adv. M P DESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHILPA RAJESH SHAH Advocate - H G RABARI
-
2.Government of Gujarat
Adv. T A PANCHOLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 830/2025 The Lok Adalat quashed and set aside the conviction of Satyabadi Nayak (Arnapurna Textile) dated 17.10.2025 for the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offense, and acquitted him. The parties reached an amicable settlement, and since the offense is compoundable, the court allowed the appeal and ordered compensation deposited by the accused to be disbursed to the complainant per compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 830/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 830/2025 The Lok Adalat quashed and set aside the conviction of Satyabadi Nayak (Arnapurna Textile) dated 17.10.2025 for the Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offense, and acquitted him. The parties reached an amicable settlement, and since the offense is compoundable, the court allowed the appeal and ordered compensation deposited by the accused to be disbursed to the complainant per compromise terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts