RAMILABEN KASHIRAMBHAI CHAUDHARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 474/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR010137342025
Filing Number
473/2025
Filing Date
01-11-2025
Registration No
474/2025
Registration Date
01-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
285
Police Station
ADAJAN POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMILABEN KASHIRAMBHAI CHAUDHARI
Adv. Y P TIWARI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
FOR R&P
FOR R&P
FOR R&P
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR R&P |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR R&P |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR R&P |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 474/2025: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge Surat allowed Ramilaben Kashirambhai Chaudhari's revision petition, quashing the trial court's order that had rejected her discharge application in a dowry harassment case. The court found that allegations against her were general and omnibus without specific overt acts attributed to her; being a woman accused under Section 498A IPC in a matrimonial dispute without prima facie evidence, continuing prosecution would constitute abuse of process, warranting her discharge under CrPC Section 239. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 474/2025: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge Surat allowed Ramilaben Kashirambhai Chaudhari's revision petition, quashing the trial court's order that had rejected her discharge application in a dowry harassment case. The court found that allegations against her were general and omnibus without specific overt acts attributed to her; being a woman accused under Section 498A IPC in a matrimonial dispute without prima facie evidence, continuing prosecution would constitute abuse of process, warranting her discharge under CrPC Section 239. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts